Reducing Hiring Bias: A Practical Guide for People Leaders

Hiring decisions shape everything. From the makeup of your teams to how much trust employees place in leadership. And yet, even experienced People Leaders know how easy it is for hiring bias to sneak in.

A candidate gets fast-tracked because they remind someone of themselves. Another gets overlooked because their resume doesn’t “look quite right.” The feedback sounds neutral, like “just not a fit,” but something underneath is driving the decision.

You’ve seen this happen. You’ve probably felt the discomfort of it. And like many People Leaders, you’re looking for a better way forward.

This guide is here to help. Inside, you’ll find:

• A clear breakdown of what hiring bias looks like in real life
• 11 most common types of bias
• 6 actionable ways to reduce bias at every stage of the hiring process

Whether you're building your first structured interview process or evolving a mature system, these tools are designed to help you and your hiring managers make thoughtful, aligned, and equitable choices consistently.

What Is Hiring Bias?

Hiring bias refers to both conscious and unconscious preferences that skew how we source, assess, and select candidates.

• Conscious bias is intentional. Think “we don’t want someone who’s going to go on maternity leave soon.”
• Unconscious bias is automatic and hidden, like feeling inexplicably “off” about someone’s tone of voice or name.

Bias shows up all along the hiring journey:

• Resume screening: dismissing candidates with unfamiliar names or degrees
• Small talk: bonding over shared hobbies that subtly influence decisions
• Interviewing: favoring candidates who “feel right” but lack evidence
• Feedback writeups: coded language like “not a culture fit” or “just didn’t click”

In a 2021 study of over 83,000 job applications, applicants with distinctively Black names received significantly fewer callbacks, even when qualifications were identical​.

Let’s be clear. Saying “everyone’s biased” isn’t a free pass. It’s a call to lead differently. Because while not every company is part of the problem, you can be part of the solution by setting a new standard in your industry.

Science of Unconscious Bias

Researchers have found that bias starts developing surprisingly early, as early as 6-9 months old. In one study, infants already showed a preference for people who looked like them.

There are a few reasons why this happens. One is that our brains naturally favor people we see as part of “our group”, whether that’s based on race, background, or shared experience. Another is that we tend to prefer what feels familiar or “normal,” which can make us resistant to anything outside the status quo.

Over time, the messages we absorb from media, education, family, and society shape how we see others. We may not even realize it. These messages can lead to automatic associations and stereotypes that quietly influence our decisions.

The result? Bias isn’t something we choose. It’s something we absorb. And unless we surface it, it keeps shaping how we see people at work.

Meet “The Little Voice” That Drives Big Decisions

We teach People Leaders to tune into something we call “the little voice.” It’s the inner monologue running quietly in the background of your decisions.

• “She’s a bit intense…”
• “He seems more polished.”
• “I can’t put my finger on it, but I don’t see her thriving here.”

The little voice is often where bias lives. And unless we pause and examine it, it becomes the puppet master, pulling our strings while we believe we’re acting rationally​. 

Sometimes we call it “gut feeling”. Gut feelings are emotionally satisfying but cognitively lazy.

When under pressure, our brains crave shortcuts. That’s when bias quietly steps in, masquerading as instinct. 

Instead, replace gut instinct with structured, evidence-based assessment. Your candidates (and your team) will thank you.

The 11 Most Common Hiring Biases (With Real-World Examples)

Let’s name them so we can tame them:

1. Affinity Bias: Favoring candidates who feel like “one of us”. A manager clicks with a candidate who went to the same university and ends up fast-tracking them
2. Halo/Horn Effect: Overweighting one great (or poor) trait. Because a candidate worked at a prestigious company, the interviewer assumes they must also be a strong communicator
3. Confirmation Bias: Seeking evidence to confirm your first impression. An interviewer gets a “bad vibe” early on and spends the rest of the interview noticing only the stumbles.
4. Anchoring Bias: Fixating on the first piece of info you learn. The recruiter sees that a candidate started their career at a small, unknown company and mentally tags them as “junior”
5. Beauty Bias: Assuming attractive candidates are more competent. A sharply dressed, photogenic candidate is perceived as more competent.
6. Attribution Bias: Blaming others’ failures on personality, not context. A candidate struggles to explain a tough project outcome. The panel assumes they’re not strategic. 
7. Name/Race/Ethnicity Bias: Well-documented impact on callbacks.
8. Age/Gender Bias: Subtle but powerful in perceived fit and potential. A woman in her 30s is subtly asked if she has children, and the panel later wonders aloud if she’ll be “fully available” for a demanding role.
9. Proximity Bias: Favoring in-office candidates in hybrid roles. A remote candidate is rated as “less engaged” because they didn’t participate in informal office chats.
10. Conformity Bias: Going with the group instead of speaking up. During the debrief, one senior interviewer says “She’s clearly not a fit.” No one challenges the opinion.
11. Disability Bias: Assume people with disabilities are less capable, competent, or suitable for a role. A candidate with a visible physical disability is assumed to be less capable of managing client relationships.

6 Actionable Steps to Reduce Hiring Bias

1. Start with a Vision, Not a Job Description

Most hiring mistakes trace back to a fuzzy definition of success. That’s why before you even touch a job description, you need to define a clear vision for the role.

This vision becomes your North Star. It drives alignment across stakeholders, gives your recruiter clarity, and forms the foundation for a structured, bias-resistant hiring process.

Here’s what your vision should include:

• Purpose of the role. What is the core impact this role is meant to have? Think beyond a task list. You’re looking for one or two sentences that describe why this role exists.
• Key outcomes. What does success look like 6-12 months in? Spell out the results this person needs to deliver (not tasks).
• Core competencies. What skills, behaviors, and attributes are required to achieve those outcomes? Split these into technical and behavioral competencies.
• Culture add, not culture fit. Instead of hiring someone who fits in, hire someone who adds something valuable to the team’s dynamics.

Once you’ve defined these 4 components, your vision becomes your interview scorecard. Each outcome or competency turns into a row. Interviewers are assigned to assess specific rows. Everyone is aligned on what “good” looks like.

This structure helps eliminate guesswork and “gut feel” decisions while replacing them with focused, evidence-based assessment. 

2. Design Diverse, Intentional Panels

It’s not enough to put together a group of well-meaning interviewers. To reduce hiring bias and improve decision-making, your panel needs to be intentionally designed for fairness, depth, and inclusion.

Mix up the perspectives in the room. Include cross-functional and cross-level Interviewers.

• Cross-functional: Involve interviewers from other teams who will partner with this role. They bring a fresh lens, especially when assessing collaboration or influence across the org.
• Cross-level: Don’t just staff the panel with VPs. Include peers or even junior team members who can give feedback on how approachable or supportive the candidate might be day-to-day.

3. Source Beyond Your Bubble

Referrals are fast, familiar, and often high-converting. But the problem is they tend to replicate what already exists.

That’s because people refer to people like them: similar backgrounds, networks, education, geography, even personality. Over time, this leads to homogeneous hiring funnels, even if your team values inclusion.

So what can you do differently?

Ask your team to do more than just tap their inner circle. Invite them to:

• Share open roles with communities they’re not part of
• Use inclusive messaging in outreach (“We’re especially excited to welcome applicants from underrepresented backgrounds”)
• Pause and check: “Does this candidate pool reflect the diversity of the talent market or just the reach of our networks?”

You can even dedicate 10 minutes in your next team meeting to brainstorm outreach ideas together.

Look beyond LinkedIn and traditional channels. Form relationships with groups that specialize in connecting underrepresented talent with opportunities. For example:

• CodePath (tech roles)
• HBCU Connect (Historically Black Colleges and Universities)
• Disability:IN (disability-inclusive hiring)
• Latinas in Tech
• Local non-profits and workforce development programs in your region

These partnerships take time to build, but they create deeper, more authentic pipelines in the long run.

4. Use Blind Early Screening

Even well-intentioned recruiters and hiring managers can be swayed by irrelevant details when scanning resumes, especially when they’re reviewing dozens in one sitting or feeling fatigued. That’s when unconscious bias tends to sneak in.

Blind screening is a simple but powerful way to reduce bias early in the process by removing identity-revealing information from resumes and applications before assessment.

What to redact in early-stage screening:

• Names
• Graduation years (can trigger age bias)
• Photos
• Email addresses or LinkedIn URLs
• School names (which may signal socioeconomic background or country of origin)
• Zip codes or locations (can invite class or race-based assumptions)
• Hobbies or affiliations (which may trigger affinity or cultural bias)

Even something as small as a name can derail objectivity. Studies have shown that when candidate names were hidden, callback rates for underrepresented groups improved significantly.

5. Structure Interviews Like a Scientist

Unstructured interviews are breeding grounds for bias. When interviewers “go with the flow” or trust their instincts, they end up evaluating based on vibe instead of evidence. That’s where bias sneaks in and that’s why structure matters.

A structured interview is like running a controlled experiment. You’re not having a nice chat, you’re actually gathering data like a scientist.

To run structured interviews well, use the STAR Method. Ask behavioral questions that get candidates to walk you through a real past experience. Use STAR as your mental checklist:

• Situation: What was the context?
• Task: What was their goal?
• Action: What did they actually do?
• Result: What was the outcome?

STAR forces interviewers to gather evidence, not impressions. That helps reduce the halo/horn effect (when one trait overshadows others) and confirmation bias (when we only hear what supports our gut reaction)​. 

6. Build Bias Reflection into Team Culture

Reducing hiring bias involves shaping a culture where reflection is part of the routine and bias interruption is built into everyday decision-making.

Here’s how to start building that muscle across your team:

(Before Interview) Train Your Hiring Managers

Enable your hiring managers to ask the following questions to uncover biases that may be pulling the strings. 

• “Who do I feel most comfortable with and why?” Think about the people you naturally connect with. Do they share similar backgrounds, values, or styles? That comfort might be a clue to unconscious bias.
• “What stereotypes do I tend to believe without meaning to?” Listen for your “little voice” during meetings. Do you make snap assumptions based on race, gender, age, or other traits? Try this quick fill-in-the-blank exercise to spot hidden patterns:

• All gay people are _______. 
• Women are always _______. 
• Men are _______. 
• Black people are ______. 
• Gen Z is ______. 
• Older people are _______. 
• My manager is ________. 

If the answers made them pause, good. That’s the point. Awareness is the first step.

• “Who do I give more (or less) credibility to and why?” In meetings, do you unconsciously tune in to some people more than others? Do you interrupt certain voices, or overlook contributions without realizing it? Look for patterns—and ask yourself if they’re based on evidence or assumption.

(During Interview) Catch “The Little Voice” in the Moment

Encourage hiring managers to pause when they feel strong hesitation or enthusiasm and ask themselves:

• “What’s the story I’m telling myself about this person?” Is it based on evidence? Or is it a narrative tied to how they look, speak, or where they’ve worked?
• “Would I feel the same if they looked different or had a different name?” This is your real-time bias filter. Use it as a moment to recalibrate before moving forward.

(After Interview) Add a Bias Checkpoint Before Every Hiring Decision

Before anyone advances (or gets rejected), ask the following questions: 

• “What specific evidence supports my assessment?” Especially effective for interrupting the halo/horn effect or confirmation bias.
• “Who do I feel most comfortable interacting with and why?” This surfaces affinity bias. Maybe you click more with extroverted candidates. Or prefer those who remind you of yourself 10 years ago.
• “What stereotypes might be operating here?” Useful for uncovering name, gender, age, or disability bias. A manager keeps calling a female candidate “nice” but isn’t clear on her leadership impact. That’s a signal to pause and reassess the criteria.
• “Am I giving different levels of attention or credibility to certain people and if so, why?” Proximity bias shows up here, especially in hybrid teams.

Here are 4 quick ways to make this part of your hiring culture:

1. Build these questions into debrief templates, scorecard reviews or interviewer prep sessions
2. Use nudges. Add reflection prompts to scorecard forms or debrief docs:
   “What’s one assumption you had to pause and check?”
3. Train your panels. Spend 10 minutes before every new hiring cycle walking through these bias interrupters and use bias-free language.
4. Model it yourself. When HR leaders or hiring managers openly name their own little voice, “I found myself assuming X because of Y,” it makes it safer for others to do the same.

The goal isn’t perfection. It’s awareness + action. The more you normalize pausing to reflect, the more your hiring process becomes not just fairer but sharper, too.

{{blogcta2="/style-guide"}}

Change Starts One Hire At a Time

Every hiring decision is an opportunity to shape the future of your team and the culture people experience every day.

Bias isn’t always loud. Often, it whispers through preferences we can’t quite explain or assumptions we don’t even realize we’re making. But when left unchecked, those small moments compound into patterns that exclude, overlook, and limit what your organization can become.

As a People Leader, you play a key role in shaping a hiring culture grounded in clarity, curiosity, and accountability at every step.

Start small. Pick one place in your process to shift. Whether it’s how your team writes job descriptions, how your interview panels are formed, or how you debrief after a candidate walks out the (virtual) door.

One thoughtful change at a time is how progress sticks. So, what’s the first change you’ll make?

‍